Best price guarantee 

Free tire replacement coverage 

24/7 roadside assistance 

Easy returns 

Compare

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires

Last updated 2/05/2025 - Originally published 2/05/2025
Written by SimpleTire, Expertly reviewed by Brett Antosh

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires

In the American subcontinent, Hankook and Yokohama are quite popular because of their value-offering range of tires. While Hankook is headquartered in South Korea and has been optional since the 1940s, Yokohama was founded in 1917 and has its headquarters in Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan. The Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) and the Geolandar X-AT are the respective all-terrain tires of Hankook and Yokohama, suitable for use on Jeeps, light trucks, and SUVs.

These all-terrain tires provide drivers the convenience of driving on- and off-road, assuring that they enjoy the best of both worlds to the fullest. Both Hankook and Yokohama have utilized the best of their technologies and incorporated advanced features in the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) and Geolandar X-AT tires. These tires are getting quite popular among enthusiasts in the United States who want to buy a single set of tires that’s year-round compatible and can also offer reliable driving in on and off the road.

They both come with great tread life warranties to provide maximum ownership benefits to the drivers and sport aggressive tread that compliments the looks of the likes of Wranglers, F-Series trucks, and other compatible vehicles on the market.

If you have shortlisted these tires for purchase and want to choose the one that best meets your driving requirements, then this Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Geolandar X-AT tires comparison will give you details of the tires’ overall, traction, handling, and longevity impressions. To make your tire selection easy, we have utilized our proprietary tire rating system SimpleScore.

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) 3 tires

The Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) made its debut in April 2022 and comes as a great choice for the drivers of light trucks, Jeeps, and SUVs. The tire is backed by a strong tread life warranty and is also Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified, which allows drivers to drive in moderate to severe winter conditions, in temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit. It is also M+S (Mud and Snow) rated to offer that much-needed extra command on muddy and snowy terrains. The durability construction, solid grip on every rough terrain, extra command on ice, quieter and more comfortable rides, sporty design, and long-lasting tread life make this tire great enough to score a higher 8.4 overall SimpleScore.

Get Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires

The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT was launched in July 2019 and is engineered to conquer both pavement and peaks. Alongside being a suitable choice for SUVs, light trucks, and Jeeps, the tire is also compatible with some CUVs on the market. The tire is very well optimized for quieter rides and damage resistance, and a tread life warranty on offer certainly adds more value to the purchase. The off-road durability, long-lasting tread life, and enhanced off-road traction make the tire good enough to earn an 8.6 SimpleScore. Unlike the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12), the Geolandar X-AT is not Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified.

Get Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires on traction

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires on traction

Let’s start with the analysis of the traction performance of these tires as it relates to their on- and off-road surface biting ability and indicates how good is the tire when it comes to maintaining grip year-round.

The Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) scores an 8.4 SimpleScore rating in traction and comes with multi-directional grooves and sipes that provide better traction in any direction. The biting block edges and Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification increase the tire’s traction performance in winter weather, while the aggressive sidewall shoulders enhance off-road traction. Additionally, the sharper block edges and grooves improve the tire’s traction performance in milder muddy and wet conditions.

On the other hand, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is also great and secures an 8.5 SimpleScore in traction. It comes with an optimized, aggressive tread pattern that offers improved strength and grip on both roads as well as rough conditions. The solid center blocks also enhance traction performance by boosting the tire’s surface-holding ability in varied conditions. The tread also features sipes and narrow grooves for improved grip and traction on slick, wet, and light snow surfaces, while the dynamic shoulder blocks increase the presence of biting edges for increased surefootedness.

While both tires offer great traction performance, the Geolandar X-AT surpasses the Dynapro AT3 Xtreme (RF12) taking a 1-0 lead!

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar X-AT

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires on handling

Handling is another important aspect that needs to be discussed here as it will help you understand how the tire responds to the driver’s steering command and how it fares when it comes to ride control, lane changes, and stability.

The Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) scores an 8.3 in handling, which confirms its better steering response. The tire is quiet and comfortable and features a wide and flat footprint that provides stability. The center rib takes the responsibility for quicker lane changes, while the shoulder blocks absorb the pressures while cornering and turning on terrains. The tough construction of the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) provides the much-needed steering command.

On the contrary, the Geolandar X-AT scores an 8.5 rating, assuring sharper steering response. The contact with the surface gets better with the wide and flat footprint, while the center tread blocks ensure quicker lane changes. There are dynamic shoulder blocks that improve the surface biting ability, assuring increased stability while driving on paved roads. Likewise, the tough sidewalls and multiple sipes further improve ride control, steering response, and cornering performance.

The Dynapro tires are great on the handling front, however, Geolandar tires take the lead again with a slightly higher SimpleScore rating and an array of impressive features.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar X-AT

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires on longevity

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires on longevity

Which of the two tires we are comparing are long-lasting – the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) or the Geolandar X-AT? Let’s find it out in this section!

Starting with the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12), the tire scores a great 8.8 SimpleScore in longevity. This confirms that the tire is built tough and can resist wear. It is backed by a solid tread life warranty of up to 70,000 miles, which means you need not worry about the tire’s tread life any time soon. Thanks to the aggressive shoulders and sidewall, the tire can resist cuts in an off-road environment while providing adequate protection. Additionally, the Max mileage technology and durable rubber compound of the Hankook tire help boost the tread life.

Comparatively, the Geolandar X-AT scores a 9.0 rating in longevity and is also covered by an up to 50,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty. With such a higher rating in longevity, you can be assured of the tire’s long-lasting service. Its elliptical contact area ensures longer and even wear and the HD-2 off-road compound also helps boost the tread life, alongside providing solid cut and chip resistance. The use of Geo-Shield Technology also contributes to the durability and provides optimum punctures and wear resistance. Additionally, the Geolandar X-AT utilizes dual sidewall protectors to resist impacts and punctures and promote longevity.

In the long-lasting area, yet again the Geolandar X-AT outperformed the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12), winning in all three areas comparison.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar X-AT

When to use each

Both, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) and the Geolandar X-AT are all-terrain tires and they are suitable for on- and off-road use. While the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) is Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified for driving in dry, wet, and severe winter conditions, the Geolandar X-AT comes a good choice for driving in rain, shine, and milder snow conditions.

As far as the rim sizes are concerned, both the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) and the Geolandar X-AT are available in 15- to 22-inch choices.

Which one should you choose?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT tires

Based on the overall SimpleScore, the Geolandar X-AT is a better choice with a higher 8.6 score than the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme which scores an 8.4 rating. However, both tires are unique in their ways and have their own strengths, which must be analyzed to get a set of tires that best meets your driving requirements.

Coming to the price part, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme (RF12) is available at a starting price of at least $142 per tire, while the Geolandar X-AT is available at a starting price of at least $222 per tire. This means that a set of four Hankook tires will cost you at least $568, while a set of four Yokohama tires can be bought at a price of at least $888.

Looking at SimpleScore, you should choose the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme if you:

  • Drive a full-size SUV like the Lexus LX570, a pickup truck like the Nissan Titan, or a mid-size truck like the Jeep Gladiator.
  • Need a tire that’s Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified for driving in moderate to severe winter conditions.
  • Prefer a tire that’s backed by a 70,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty.
  • Want a tire that offers quieter and comfortable rides.
  • Need a more affordable tire, yet a decent performer on- and off-road.

On the other hand, you should buy the Geolandar X-AT if you:

  • Drive a heavy-duty truck like the Ford F-250, a mid-size SUV like the Toyota 4Runner, or a full-size pickup truck like the GMC Sierra 1500.
  • Want a tire that’s better in traction (8.5 vs 8.4) and handling (8.5 vs 8.3).
  • Prefer a tire that’s better in longevity (9.0 vs 8.8).
  • Want a tire that’s suitable for driving in dry, wet, and light snow conditions on- and off-road.
  • Are comfortable paying more to buy an overall better tire.

Still unsure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help. Our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.

Ready to find the perfect tires?

Search By